We performed a comparison between Opvizor and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, IBM, Nutanix and others in Virtualization Management Tools."The ability to analyze my virtual infrastructure data against a rule base of 730+ rules has been the most valuable."
"VMware vSphere helps us in not wasting resources like we did when we were using physical servers. It changed our whole environment."
"The ability to create or clone a virtual environment in a short period of time for testing is most valuable."
"The most valuable features are the resilience of the solution and vMotion."
"It's easy to use."
"Technical support is very good. They are very helpful."
"In the past, we struggled with VM encryption. We couldn't encrypt the virtual machines with older versions of vSphere without some kind of third-party tool. Now, with 6.7, it's all in the application itself, in vSphere. We no longer have to procure additional products to meet that requirement. We can just do it on the fly, and pass our audit with no issues."
"It is very versatile. All features are beneficial and very good, especially DRS and resource pooling."
"It's a very useful solution. It's easy to set up, and it's pretty stable."
"Having the ability to automate some things would be nice but is not a requirement with the product today."
"The setup is easy. However, the configuration expansion can be difficult. The full implementation took three to four days. This included the move from physical servers to virtual ones."
"The pipeline feature can be improved, as it doesn't allow for specific situations."
"I can't speak to any missing features. It has everything I need."
"This solution should have a better backup policy. Furthermore, there should be an ability to expose the universal machine. In the current version, you need to shutdown and use an offline virtual machine to backup."
"I met with the lead solutions architect for vSphere, and one of the things that I really kind of sat him down on was, "What's the deal between these Custom Attributes and these Tags? What are you trying to do with that?" He said, "So here's the deal. I know that they're halfway done and we have a vision of where they're all going, but we'll get it there." That that would be a great ability, to keep all that metadata about your virtual machines inside the solution and staying with the machines."
"The one area where I would love to see an improvement is the HTML5 client. It's great, but it could get better."
"It's inherently complex. Operating a large virtual infrastructure is not an easy task for anyone."
"It would be nice if it had auto-scaling, no need to select CPU or select database size. Let it auto-scale, let it use the features that VMware has, instead of having to preselect."
Opvizor is ranked 6th in Virtualization Management Tools with 1 review while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 14 reviews. Opvizor is rated 10.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Opvizor writes "Even moving the service over to another server can be done very easily. Although, having the ability to automate some things would be nice". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers a suite of software components for virtualization including ESXi, vCenter Server, and other software". Opvizor is most compared with VMware Aria Operations, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and KVM.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.