We performed a comparison between Opvizor and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, IBM, Nutanix and others in Virtualization Management Tools."The ability to analyze my virtual infrastructure data against a rule base of 730+ rules has been the most valuable."
"It is very stable and scalable, and implementation is straightforward as well."
"The ability to monitor resource utilization."
"The documentation is very good."
"It helps to automate the data replication and DR (disaster recovery)."
"I use the ESXi a lot for my users to create their own templates and control their own VMs without my interaction."
"Valuable features include VHA, DRS, VMotion, and redundancy and failover; any DR situation."
"The most valuable feature of vSphere is its modularity. I also like the maturity updates. It's available everywhere and almost all the data centers are using it."
"The visibility that we have of our VMs is also important. What's being applied? Who has management of them? Laying it out in a virtual environment allows us customization for our students. We're able to respond to the students' needs much more quickly than we could in a physical environment."
"Having the ability to automate some things would be nice but is not a requirement with the product today."
"We've been using vSphere on Windows 7, and it had less fluff associated with ThinApp. Currently, with Windows 10 version that we have, it adds a lot of bulk to ThinApp. We have offices spanning across Canada from the east coast to the west coast. A ThinApp that is roughly around 400 MB in size would take minutes to open up. With Windows 7, the same ThinApp used to be close to 75 to 80 MB in size. So, I'm really not happy with the extra fluff that is bundled in Windows 10. It really messes things up for us at times."
"The support for the latest version could be improved."
"The solution is stable. However, it could improve by being more secure."
"Response time could be improved."
"It would be nice to see it a little more tightly integrated with the patching solution so you could do it in one pane of glass. Right now, you have to jump back and forth. It's still not difficult, but you have to jump back and forth to do your update definitions and then go back and actually do the updates themselves."
"the HTML version of things needs to get a little bit better. The vSphere side of things gets a little difficult to manage; right-click, in some browsers, doesn't work as well as it used to. I'm seeing a little bit of general latency that we didn't used to get with the thick client, although it's getting there."
"The one area where I would love to see an improvement is the HTML5 client. It's great, but it could get better."
"They need to further develop graphics virtualization."
Opvizor is ranked 6th in Virtualization Management Tools with 2 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Opvizor is rated 10.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Opvizor writes "Say goodbye to those sneaky broken and invalid snapshots hiding in your VMware environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Opvizor is most compared with VMware Aria Operations and Veeam ONE, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and KVM.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.