We performed a comparison between Opvizor and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, IBM, Nutanix and others in Virtualization Management Tools."The ability to analyze my virtual infrastructure data against a rule base of 730+ rules has been the most valuable."
"Server consolidation. Getting rid of our physical servers and going virtual is saving us some money in overall rack space."
"Since we have an internal cloud, suddenly people may require 1000 or 2000 VMS in something. We have options to analyze and make sure we have enough scalability."
"I like the capability of vMotion, DRS, high availability, and resource distribution."
"Production people can quickly reboot the server with ESXi Quick Boot."
"vMotion is one of the most useful features, which helps to provide both flexibility and High Availability. With new versions of vSphere and vCenter, it is still improving (e.g., vMotion across vCenter Servers and virtual switches)."
"Also, the automated builds are being done through it, and we don't have to manually do it anymore. All of my AIS platforms are completely automated now with the VM suite."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is vMotion."
"The scalability has been good."
"Having the ability to automate some things would be nice but is not a requirement with the product today."
"We stopped using a lot of cloud services. However, I see that VMware has integrated with Amazon Cloud. We will now to have to move everything to the cloud."
"It's an expensive solution."
"Two improvements that I would like to see are higher resolution console modes for guests and easier switching between consoles."
"It could use a smaller learning curve."
"The quality of support could be better."
"The ability to run ARM based VMs on an x86 platform for testing purposes. With the growing use of SBCs running on ARM architectures for IoT devices, it would be very useful if developers could build and deploy VMs running operating systems like Raspbian used on Raspberry Pi devices on their existing x86 ESXi environments. Even if this is not possible through some form of emulation, the ability to add ARM hypervisors to vSphere environments would be very useful. This will enable more rapid development cycles for customers just getting started with IoT but already existing vSphere users."
"The biggest room for improvement would be just simplicity. It is very intuitive, but it needs somebody with a lot of IT background."
"Reducing the cost of vSphere would be an improvement."
Opvizor is ranked 6th in Virtualization Management Tools with 2 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Opvizor is rated 10.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Opvizor writes "Say goodbye to those sneaky broken and invalid snapshots hiding in your VMware environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Opvizor is most compared with VMware Aria Operations and Veeam ONE, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and KVM.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.