We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management."We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"It is the best monitoring tool for Oracle databases."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"It's user friendly."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager for a lot of services like ERP and PLM."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring because it's very useful for checking and troubleshooting compared with other products, like Nagios for example, that have some interaction with Oracle."
"The live application feature is most valuable. The solution is stable. I rate it a seven out of ten."
"GoldenGate can connect and collect data from multiple sources, such as SQL Server."
"When we are replicating data between similar databases then it is straightforward."
"Data migration is the most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate."
"One feature that stands out for me is the data center capability."
"This is a powerful solution provided by one of the most respected companies in the computer industry."
"You can put data together from a few databases into one database or the other way, from one database into several. It transforms data in real-time."
"The replication of the data table is one of the best features."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
"The solution has a very large resource system. It's too big. There are too many items."
"It is complicated to run it on Google Chrome."
"The fact that Oracle Enterprise Manager is an expensive solution is a matter of concern and needs to be considered for improvement."
"The product must improve its support team."
"We would like to have a single dashboard for monitoring and controlling all of our products."
"You cannot put everything in Golden Gate for the license and large models."
"Oracle GoldenGate can enhance its functionality by enabling the merging of multiple migrations into one."
"Oracle GoldenGate could improve the price."
"The solution costs a lot."
"The process of transforming the data between two different databases is inefficient and needs to be improved."
"The tool's connections are disconnected at times. The tool needs to integrate other databases."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"It is not a very stable tool, and you need to monitor it perfectly."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 122 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI).
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.