We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager is a scalable solution."
"It is a comprehensive, end-to-end solution for managing database consolidation, something that has been missing and difficult to do."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"Power packs."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"The interface offered by Oracle Enterprise Manager has certain shortcomings and needs improvement to become a nice tool."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The solution has a very large resource system. It's too big. There are too many items."
"Technical support could be faster."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"The product is pretty comprehensive, but quite resource hungry. This might be due to the majority of the application seemingly being written in Java."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."
"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 122 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 6th in Server Monitoring with 42 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and AppDynamics, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and ServiceNow Discovery. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.