We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With ASH Analytics, ADDM, Real-Time SQL Monitoring, SQL Tuning Advisor, we can measure SLAs, detect performance hotspots, perform deep diagnostics into specific tiers, tune applications, and remediate."
"I have found the uptime of all of our systems to be most valuable with this solution. This is important because we need to guarantee specific uptime and preventive maintenance. We need to know upfront if there are going to be any issues on the database so we can proactively solve those."
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"SQL Tuning Advisor, ADDM, Top Activity, ASM Space Manager, Incident Notifications"
"It's user friendly."
"I think the look and feel and the accessibility to the databases, the scale of environment support."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
"It is simple."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."
"The power flow is great."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"Power packs."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"The product must improve its support team."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"The tool is expensive."
"RMAN tools need improvement."
"The solution's agents work with Java, and the Java code sometimes consumes a lot of memory on the CPU."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."
"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 122 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 6th in Server Monitoring with 42 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and AppDynamics, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and ServiceNow Discovery. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.