We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a good tool for monitoring databases."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"It is the best database management system."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"It is the best monitoring tool for Oracle databases."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"The single-pane and single interface in the centralized system is the most valuable feature."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."
"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"The power flow is great."
"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Better mobile access would be useful."
"The tool is expensive."
"The deployment is not straightforward."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"The solution is considered expensive."
"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."
"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"They need a little more self-service."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 5th in Server Monitoring with 25 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 6th in Server Monitoring with 11 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Enable centralized control & administration and cost containment of Oracle products from a single console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Granular discovery, good integration, with responsive and available support". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, Quest Foglight for Databases and AppDynamics, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and ServiceNow Discovery. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.