We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that it's stable."
"It is the best database management system."
"This solution allows us to quickly drill down when there are issues."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"The 13cR2 updates to the OEM family, strongly integrate Cloud (off-site, hybrid and on-premise) services providing a seamless way to see all of your resources regardless of where they are deployed."
"I think the look and feel and the accessibility to the databases, the scale of environment support."
"Some of the most valuable features are its real-time performance view/dashboard, metric history, real-time monitoring and alerts, as well as quick access to Oracle's tuning and diagnostic options."
"Power packs."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"The power flow is great."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"It is simple."
"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."
"In my opinion, rather than a younger DBA, think the user interface could be improved."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"The product is pretty comprehensive, but quite resource hungry. This might be due to the majority of the application seemingly being written in Java."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
"The product must improve its support team."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
"They need a little more self-service."
"The product is not user-friendly."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 122 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 6th in Server Monitoring with 42 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and ServiceNow Discovery. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.