We performed a comparison between Citrix Hypervisor and Oracle VM VirtualBox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a dependable solution for virtualization with a good community for product support."
"Scripting can automate procedures."
"Citrix Hypervisor is quick to deploy and easy to manage."
"Citrix Hypervisor is simple to use."
"The solution integrates well with other solutions, which makes it really strong as a primary solution to deploy."
"What I like the most is the support of the GPU Graphics and the VM Live migration."
"The solution is extremely stable."
"The price is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The cloning is a very useful tool."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy bidirectionally between the desktop and the virtual machine."
"It is a stable product."
"I like that it has a snapshot feature."
"The flexibility as well as performance wise and as well as data volume, we have huge volume stored."
"The product gives us the flexibility to try different machines."
"This is a highly scalable solution."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution were the support and performance of the product and the flexibility it gives you to work."
"Citrix is not investing in the virtual surroundings."
"The built-in networking features are a little limited."
"The solution would benefit from faster technical support."
"You need a licensed account to look up technical support."
"Live migration is something that can be improved."
"The self-service user portal needs to be more granular and be more customizable."
"The graphics user interface is pretty bad."
"We'd like them to add more automation to the product."
"We're working with them to be able to allow the local USB ports to be ported over to the remote desktop, running VirtualBox."
"When I select the Ubuntu operating system from within the virtual machine, it sometimes hangs."
"The solution has to do a better job of promoting the product and its licensing capabilities."
"The product lacks scalability since it is for desktops and not for servers."
"The technical support needs to improve."
"Oracle VM VirtualBox doesn't work properly with an antivirus tool."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"This solution needs improvement with the business continuity planning, disaster and recovery management and using centralized data storage."
Citrix Hypervisor is ranked 8th in Server Virtualization Software with 45 reviews while Oracle VM VirtualBox is ranked 5th in Server Virtualization Software with 61 reviews. Citrix Hypervisor is rated 8.2, while Oracle VM VirtualBox is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Citrix Hypervisor writes "Good features, fair pricing, and excellent reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM VirtualBox writes "The solution is versatile, simple to use, and stable". Citrix Hypervisor is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and Nutanix AHV Virtualization, whereas Oracle VM VirtualBox is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, KVM, Oracle VM and Nutanix AHV Virtualization. See our Citrix Hypervisor vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.