We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The most valuable feature from my point of view is project management, which includes user stories as well as task management."
"The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it."
"It's is a very stable solution."
"Stability is okay."
"The most valuable feature is integration, particularly if you have a .NET application."
"The most valuable features of TFS are the test plans. We can reproduce reusable test plans in test automation. We have a lot of queries and this feature is very useful."
"The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."
"TFS is very user-friendly."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"The solution should have better dashboards."
"TFS needs to be stable."
"TFS is scalable with different Microsoft tools for test management but it is not scalable with other third-party tools."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
"The reporting functionality is something that they should work on."
"The tool needs improvement in stability."
"The usability of TFS is not that great."
"I'd like to see some kind of visualization tool for TFS that would make life much easier."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer and Jira, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.