We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"It's is a very stable solution."
"The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."
"Complete integration with VS IDE and Office tools: This give us a possibility of high-level automation, thus minimizing human error."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is that it keeps the code secure while working collaboratively in a team of four or five individuals."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"Build definitions and releases within the product. allow us to put our latest applications in the field."
"It is easy to push our changes from quality to pre-prod and prod."
"It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server."
"There are many things that I cannot do, and I have a lot of bugs."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"TFS is scalable with different Microsoft tools for test management but it is not scalable with other third-party tools."
"The execution of test cases could stand improvement."
"TFS should allow more integration with different platforms."
"The manageability and performance of the product are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"They should have design patterns in TFS for the development team, and design patterns for the QA."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.