We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use."
"TFS' most valuable feature is the triage process. It is a robust solution that is easy to use."
"Some of the valuable features are version control and the ability to create different collections in terms of segregating the authorization for teams who connect to small projects."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch."
"Build definitions and releases within the product. allow us to put our latest applications in the field."
"Version Control: TFS offers both the centralized “TFVC” version control technology as well as the distributed “Git” version control technology."
"The solution is very much stable."
"Stability is okay."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"TFS should allow more integration with different platforms."
"I'm looking for specific options that aren't currently available, such as active status, new status, or what's currently in progress."
"There should be management of the project built-in."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
"I would also like a true command prompt like Git."
"I only use 1% of the functionality, so I am not familiar enough to know what needs to be improved."
"Since the TFS was an on-prem solution, the private network accessibility was restricted."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.