We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code."
"The interface is easy to navigate."
"The tool's installation is straightforward."
"For what I need TFS for, I have never run into any limitation."
"The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it."
"I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well."
"I like its MTM (Microsoft Test Manager) section which gives us options to create various test plans and add test cases into it."
"User alerts are very helpful for knowing when work is required."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"I would also like a true command prompt like Git."
"The solution's server for deployment needs to be improved."
"More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively."
"This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"Merging branches is definitely one of the more challenging aspects for people new to TFS."
"There are many things that I cannot do, and I have a lot of bugs."
"One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.