We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together."
"The API for managing TFS programmatically is very powerful, you can listen on work items changes by TFS events."
"This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile."
"Stability is okay."
"Basically, the capacity to construct various products is something I find handy."
"Since it is a robust solution, I face no performance issues. Also, considering how well the implementation process of the solution was carried out, we never faced any issues while using the solution."
"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."
"Version Control: TFS offers both the centralized “TFVC” version control technology as well as the distributed “Git” version control technology."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"They should have design patterns in TFS for the development team, and design patterns for the QA."
"Microsoft should discontinue the use of SharePoint as I don’t really see any value add to TFS, document management features can be included in TFS web portal itself, if required!"
"TFS needs to be stable."
"There are many things that I cannot do, and I have a lot of bugs."
"One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management."
"There should be management of the project built-in."
"The solution should have better dashboards."
"Merging branches is definitely one of the more challenging aspects for people new to TFS."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.