We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it."
"It's is a very stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch."
"The interface is good with TFS."
"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."
"For what I need TFS for, I have never run into any limitation."
"The most valuable feature is integration, particularly if you have a .NET application."
"The API for managing TFS programmatically is very powerful, you can listen on work items changes by TFS events."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management."
"Not all of the functionality, which is exposed by the command line interface (tf.exe) is available in the Visual Studio GUI."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
"We encounter issues with backups."
"More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively."
"The dashboard needs more enhancements."
"TFS isn't a great tool if you're on the cloud."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.