We performed a comparison between Broadcom Service Virtualization and Parasoft Virtualize based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization.
"It's got probably the greatest amount of features, in terms of different technologies that you can automate and virtualize, out of any of the solutions out there."
"The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services."
"The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature."
"We are able to quickly scale our requests. We have tested across thousands of requests. We have had no problems so far."
"You can have a lot of different people with different technologies use the tool, without any programming experience at all, all the way up to people who can program. And then, the more technical that you are, the more programming you have, the more you're able to customize the tool."
"In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization."
"We had a number of back-end services that were not available during testing times. What this had allowed us to do is get our early life testing done while those services are not available."
"The innovation is amazing. CA has continued to add to services that it supports, the transports that it supports, and has built all of the enterprise capabilities into the product as well."
"The initial setup is quite easy to manage."
"One major feature I would like to see is on the user administration part. Right now, anybody can access any of the folders and any of the projects."
"From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach."
"It is not a stable solution."
"Needs some additional lightweight, portable elements."
"I would rate the tech support a nine out of ten. They need more knowledge about the connectivity to DevOps orchestration."
"DevTest is pretty massive. It's hard to tell what different parts of it can be used to do different things. They should modulize it more."
"The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift."
"They can always work on usability and making simple things simple to do. This is true of every product that deals with complexity."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 97 reviews while Parasoft Virtualize is ranked 4th in Service Virtualization. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while Parasoft Virtualize is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Feature-rich, easy to configure and set up, and the support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Virtualize writes "Supports MessageQueue. Provides the ability to test applications detached from integration middleware". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with ReadyAPI Test, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server, OpenText Service Virtualization and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Parasoft Virtualize is most compared with OpenText Service Virtualization.
See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
