We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"PeopleSoft is mostly used for payroll and core HR functionality. Some customers use it for its finance module."
"I'd like PeopleSoft to be like on the cloud and more mobile-friendly. If I try to access it from a cell phone, it's a bit difficult, so it would be great if PeopleSoft could improve these features."
"I often say that PeopleSoft's greatest feature is how customizable it is."
"A valuable feature is HCM."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger."
"I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution."
"The system can be integrated with other SAP functionalities - such as finance, production, sales, marketing, HR, et cetera, and can also be customized to become a model that's specifically designed for my business. That's the solution's most valuable aspect."
"Good customization features."
"I like SAP's premade workflows for various areas, such as supply chain, procurement, or finance."
"SAP is more reliable in terms of data quality than other systems."
"It is the best solution in the class of ERP products."
"It provides great visibility into the details of enterprise resource planning."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"SAP ERP offers a wide range of functional modules, including payroll, HR, financials, and others."
"An area for improvement would be that it's quite difficult to learn how to use this product, and the documentation provided isn't helpful in giving you practical advice."
"I would like for the initial rollout process to be completed faster so that it can be implemented in a more efficient manner."
"Having applications which provide more enhanced features and user-friendly elements."
"The learning and development side of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"PeopleSoft lacks integration capabilities."
"The implementation of PeopleSoft is quite complex and is not as easy as other cloud products such as SuccessFactor or Workday."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"One aspect where PeopleSoft could see improvement is in its level of customization."
"Its user interface should be improved."
"It needs a more complete guidance with complete processes. Right now, it only has single transactions."
"It is very expensive to customize to meet compliance with regulations in some countries."
"Lacks sufficient technical support with slow response times."
"Though SAP ERP's FICO module is a strong part of the product, its integration capabilities can be made stronger."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Poor ergonomics."
"The integration with others application could be easier. There are many different features that this solution offers which could be easier to implement."
PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 79 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.