We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"I would rate scalability a nine out of ten."
"In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more repetition can be done in an even manner. That way, it can be designed for what the public or user actually wants. It's not very tough for any person, or layman to understand exactly what the screen requires one to do."
"Very stable in terms of performance and scalability."
"The solution's scalability is good."
"A solid and mature product."
"This solution integrates very well with other products which is helpful."
"The integration between Human Capital Management (HCM) and PeopleSoft is an important feature."
"The most valuable features of SAP ERP is the flexibility and functionality. It is one of the best ERPs I have seen in the market."
"The power of ABAP Development Tools is the main valuable feature in the SAP ECC system. Every couple of years SAP upgrades ABAP technology significantly, which facilitates developers' work."
"Everyone who uses SAP ERP has benefited from the functionality."
"I like SAP's premade workflows for various areas, such as supply chain, procurement, or finance."
"The product connects to every software."
"It automates transactional processes."
"The solution is very stable."
"It provides one overview of the capacity planning."
"There could be more adaptability of the system."
"Tools and UI could be enhanced."
"Areas that need improvement are the add-ons to the fluid pages and additional features in SCM and finance, both functionally and technically."
"The API integration could be better."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"The solution's initial setup is not straightforward."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"One aspect where PeopleSoft could see improvement is in its level of customization."
"Sometimes the cost is not reasonable, such as in the case of budgeting."
"The initial setup of SAP ERP is complex and it took a lot of time."
"There should be better support provided to be able to migrate to S/4HANA easier."
"Technical support could be better."
"SAP ERP needs to be more innovative when it comes to areas like mobility and the internet."
"I always prefer using an S/4HANA system."
"The reporting could be improved, such as the casework, production, and activity reports. Our consultants in a subsidiary enterprise have requested that we develop a new production report. They could also improve production, financial, and HR analysis."
"It is very expensive to customize to meet compliance with regulations in some countries."
PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 80 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.