We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"Very stable in terms of performance and scalability."
"Stability-wise, it is a good tool."
"The integration between Human Capital Management (HCM) and PeopleSoft is an important feature."
"It's a mature product."
"PeopleSoft is resilient and has the flexibility for us to customize it."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"The solution is very mature."
"Control and governance are the best features."
"Good customization features."
"I have found all the modules related to finance valuable, such as account management and HR. The entire suite is very useful."
"The solution provides a high level of integration."
"It is a utility-focused solution, and the deployment is very much aligned with utility service providers. If you look at the supply chain and the overall business model of a utility service provider, SAP is something that fits very well. That's because the company has invested tremendously in creating appropriate workflows pertaining to this segment or domain."
"It provides one overview of the capacity planning."
"The most valuable features are the claim management."
"The solution's initial setup is not straightforward."
"The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this."
"Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."
"Services that need improvement include PeopleSoft Query, Pivot Grids, and PeopleSoft Test Framework."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"My developers want to use more HTML instead of the specialized tool, PeopleTools because, they say, it's better from a user perspective."
"Global payroll could be easier to use."
"Stability is an area where the solution lacks and needs to be improved."
"Its user interface should be improved."
"The problem for us, we are one company that has seven home markets. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. When we need to configure, modify rules, change policies, or taxes rules, when we move currencies around based on our other financial results, it can get very complicated. When we try to join everything together we have some problems. However, the process good, all of our material and procurement processes are going well. The problem is trying to consolidate the financial reports and this is where I have problems."
"The product can be a little slow when dealing with thousands of employee data."
"Pricing could be improved for preferred customers."
"In previous generations, SAP was stable and the roadmap was very predictable, but currently it's very difficult."
"The initial setup is complex."
"ERP could use better integration with other systems."
"There will always be something within our business that it won't fit."
PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 79 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.