We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for us is the integration between the HR Payroll and Financials modules"
"The integration between Human Capital Management (HCM) and PeopleSoft is an important feature."
"The most valuable feature is ERP application information."
"This solution integrates very well with other products which is helpful."
"I'd like PeopleSoft to be like on the cloud and more mobile-friendly. If I try to access it from a cell phone, it's a bit difficult, so it would be great if PeopleSoft could improve these features."
"The PeopleSoft interface is very good."
"It's great for helping users deal with their supply chain."
"It's a mature product."
"It provides great visibility into the details of enterprise resource planning."
"It is a stable solution."
"We like that we have real-time dashboard views."
"The implementation is very straightforward."
"SAP ERP provides the perfect database and options for additional production. It's also good for finance analytics, production drill-down, and other types of analysis."
"Overall the solution is very good in the industry."
"The transactional integration of operations is the best-recommended feature of this product. It provides integration of all operational modules."
"The Material Management and Sales and Distribution modules are great. The Financial Accounting module is also great."
"One aspect where PeopleSoft could see improvement is in its level of customization."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"I would like to see improvement in the UI."
"Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."
"On the other hand, the more recent push for standardization precludes customized approaches to certain industry requirements."
"PeopleSoft lacks integration capabilities."
"The solution's initial setup is not straightforward."
"Initial setup can be complex without training or use of consultants."
"Their support should be improved. Instead of giving a general solution, their consultants should first try to understand the problem and then resolve the same. They should properly investigate the issue before providing the solution."
"We will not make any major changes, and we are not expecting any enhancements or new features from SAP because they already have a new solution. No development is happening on SAP ERP because SAP has come up with a new version called SAP S/4HANA, which is memory-based technology. We are planning to upgrade to SAP S/4HANA, but we don't know when it will happen. We are in the preparation phase."
"SAP ERP needs to be more innovative when it comes to areas like mobility and the internet."
"Technical support could be better."
"Customizations are a bit expensive."
"It was not designed to service all industries."
"Poor ergonomics."
"They need to improve a few processes, including transformation, intelligence, governance, modeling, etc."
PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 80 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.