We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The synchronization of business processes, and the software, streamlined the shared service departments to run 40% leaner."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"PeopleSoft is scalable."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"The time system is what we get the most benefit from."
"It's very fully featured. It has more features and more configurability than SAP."
"PeopleSoft is mostly used for payroll and core HR functionality. Some customers use it for its finance module."
"I often say that PeopleSoft's greatest feature is how customizable it is."
"This is a robust solution with a lot of control measures."
"I have found all the modules related to finance valuable, such as account management and HR. The entire suite is very useful."
"The transactional integration of operations is the best-recommended feature of this product. It provides integration of all operational modules."
"ERP is very stable."
"We like that we have real-time dashboard views."
"It is a stable solution...Our company has experienced a return on investment using the solution."
"The most valuable features are the ease of installation and the MM functionality."
"The solution can easily be standardized across processes."
"Global payroll could be easier to use."
"The UI and user experience are not great, and it's not as feature-rich as today's systems. Furthermore, our implementation does not include all the components we need, like payroll or some other functions."
"Scalability is not there in PeopleSoft. Its performance and resilience are also very bad. When you're trying to stretch it, it breaks. It is not resilient. It is also not stable. It is stable as far as data is concerned, but the infrastructure is not stable."
"An area for improvement would be that it's quite difficult to learn how to use this product, and the documentation provided isn't helpful in giving you practical advice."
"I would like to see improvement in the UI."
"I would like to see it become available again in Mexico."
"I would like to see a better UI."
"Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."
"I do not have any notes for improvements."
"Technical support could be better."
"Its user interface should be improved."
"I'm only working on the front end with ERP's user interface, which isn't very easy for end-users. It's an old-school interface, so it's often challenging to find what you need."
"The user interface isn't as nice as SAP HANA's."
"The integration with others application could be easier. There are many different features that this solution offers which could be easier to implement."
"Lacks sufficient technical support with slow response times."
"The product does not update budgeting based on exchange rates which is important for BPM."
PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 80 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.