We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is IDE."
"PeopleSoft is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"PeopleSoft is easy to understand, where any end user that is logged in can easily navigate through the menus."
"PeopleSoft is an amazing solution. Its users can have total control of the system, including PeopleCode, Application Engine and Component Interface, along with many other tools delivered by PeopleSoft."
"A solid and mature product."
"Very stable in terms of performance and scalability."
"The time system is what we get the most benefit from."
"This is a robust and feature-rich solution."
"The new Visual Enterprise functionalities give an intuitive approach to data and make communication between engineering and production easy."
"The architecture of the solution overall is great. It's great for development, testing, and production. I've worked with solutions where the architecture wasn't as strong and it was a disaster."
"Their tech support is always good."
"It provides one overview of the capacity planning."
"The most valuable features are that it's very customizable and it's flexible."
"The system can be integrated with other SAP functionalities - such as finance, production, sales, marketing, HR, et cetera, and can also be customized to become a model that's specifically designed for my business. That's the solution's most valuable aspect."
"The solution is very stable."
"Initial setup can be complex without training or use of consultants."
"PeopleSoft can improve by having proper connectors. It's very difficult to change some interfaces with the other systems."
"It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports."
"The Work Center feature in PeopleSoft is a step in the right direction in consolidating someone's role-based interaction with the system. This enhanced functionality streamlines workflows and improves efficiency."
"I would like to see better support, bug fixing, and documentation."
"Response time takes very long and requires a person to be awake night and day to benefit from it."
"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration."
"I would like to see a better UI."
"It's very difficult to find people who are well versed in it."
"The reporting feature could improve in SAP ERP. It could benefit from being more flexible."
"Improvements to the UI. The UI is pretty old, but this will change with the upcoming release of S.4."
"If big companies are going for SAP and they would like to install it, they should know that it still needs time. Implementation will cost a lot of money."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"The product does not update budgeting based on exchange rates which is important for BPM."
"It's difficult to code; structured language is difficult."
"The user interface isn't as nice as SAP HANA's."
PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 80 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.