GoCD vs PTC Integrity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Thoughtworks Logo
216 views|174 comparisons
PTC Logo
2,818 views|2,199 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GoCD and PTC Integrity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GoCD vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive.""Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

More GoCD Pros →

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.""We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.""The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.""It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks.""PTC Integrity has good stability.""The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions.""The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.""Complete traceability as per process requirements."

More PTC Integrity Pros →

Cons
"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us.""The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

More GoCD Cons →

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.""There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.""It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.""The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields.""For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility.""I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.""It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use.""To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

More PTC Integrity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's an open-source and free tool."
  • "This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."
  • More GoCD Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in… more »
    Top Answer:GoCD could cover the authentication aspect. Currently, we are handling an in-house development that needs this. Comprehensive features must be established before transitioning into an enterprise… more »
    Top Answer:PTC Integrity has good stability.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. They should improve the pricing.
    Top Answer:The product requires a learning curve. For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility. Our maintenance team finds it challenging to customize some… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    216
    Comparisons
    174
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    631
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    2,818
    Comparisons
    2,199
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    218
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go
    MKS
    Learn More
    Overview
    GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.
    The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
    Sample Customers
    Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers
    TRW Automotive
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Retailer11%
    REVIEWERS
    Transportation Company45%
    Manufacturing Company27%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm18%
    Engineering Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company24%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Transportation Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise43%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    GoCD vs. PTC Integrity
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GoCD vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GoCD is ranked 14th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 3 reviews while PTC Integrity is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews. GoCD is rated 8.0, while PTC Integrity is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of GoCD writes "User-friendly, useful multiple pipeline capabilities, and low resource consumption". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "A flexible tool which you can bend and reformat in many ways ". GoCD is most compared with GitLab, Tekton, Microsoft Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions and Jenkins, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with Codebeamer, Polarion ALM, Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps and IBM Rational ALM. See our GoCD vs. PTC Integrity report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.