OpenText Silk Test vs Qualitia Automation Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Test and Qualitia Automation Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts.""The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.""The statistics that are available are very good.""The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.""A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing.""The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.""The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

More OpenText Silk Test Pros →

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."

More Qualitia Automation Studio Pros →

Cons
"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side.""We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important.""They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.""The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.""The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.""Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are.""The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

More OpenText Silk Test Cons →

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."

More Qualitia Automation Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."
  • More OpenText Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
  • More Qualitia Automation Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it.
    Top Answer:Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution.
    Top Answer:The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack.
    Ranking
    24th
    Views
    1,338
    Comparisons
    927
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    23rd
    Views
    182
    Comparisons
    112
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    307
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    Qualitia Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
    Qualitia gives you simple step wise approach to quickly build your test automation and handle complexities easily with its unique scriptless approach. Qualitia gives you smart alerts and analysis to adopt changes effectively, making it agile friendly.
    Sample Customers
    Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
    Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government11%
    Transportation Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Automation Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Silk Test is ranked 24th in Test Automation Tools while Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6, while Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Apache JMeter, OpenText UFT Developer and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText UFT One.

    See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.