We performed a comparison between Rackspace Cloud [EOL] and Salesforce Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds."The most valuable feature for us is the support, which is really efficient."
"There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services."
"Image backup is a valuable feature. Even though this is a common feature, it is very helpful for us."
"When compared to Siebel, the Salesforce Platform is easier to use."
"We used it for providing a 360 view of the customers from within Salesforce. So, a lot of data got presented there, for which we used Einstein Analytics. The Einstein Analytics dashboards were really great."
"The stability has been great."
"It works beautifully. I haven't had any errors."
"I'm not sure what the most valuable aspect of the solution is, but I can say that their finance and auditing systems are quite impressive. You can audit in different invoices right to procurement. It's all quite seamless."
"What we like the most about it is the fact that it helps us track the record of our projects. It keeps everything on one interface, facilitating the operations and planning."
"The scalability of the Salesforce Platform is good."
"he solution has improved over the years and the inputting of opportunity information is done a lot better and the GUI is good. The ability to customize dashboards and other elements was useful, we were able to move things around, for example, the forecasts. Most of the cells and input places were set, but we can customize the view and what we were looking at, such as on a daily, or weekly basis."
"It would be nice to have more built-in suites compared to others. It would enable easier integration."
"It doesn't offer Elastic IP like AWS. And also we can't configure our server based on region."
"Easier process to move to Lightning Components."
"It would be better if they can add more from the pricing and functionality perspective. It is very expensive. I would be more than happy if they drop the prices. From the licensing perspective, if they can add more functionality, I would be more than happy."
"Areas of improvement can be around Engagement of Customers feature and approvals of transactional records."
"Some business functionalities could be improved."
"It does need very specific resources to help deploy it and buy in from the users. It's one of those items it's pretty disruptive and if it's not deployed properly and if it doesn't get utilized efficiently, it won't be effective."
"A company needs to carefully consider how they set up Salesforce in order to ensure it benefits them."
"Salesforce Platform could improve by having better integration with Microsoft Azure. For development, we use Microsoft Azure and there was proper integration between the two solutions. We had issues with the customer and they were logged into the Salesforce Platform. We did not have any good way of integrating those issues into the R&D. The R&D mainly uses Microsoft Azure."
"There needs to be more documentation."
Earn 20 points
Rackspace Cloud [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in PaaS Clouds while Salesforce Platform is ranked 8th in PaaS Clouds with 80 reviews. Rackspace Cloud [EOL] is rated 8.6, while Salesforce Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Rackspace Cloud [EOL] writes "There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salesforce Platform writes "Reliable with good reporting and custom dashboards". Rackspace Cloud [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Salesforce Platform is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Microsoft Azure, Appian and ServiceNow.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.