We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Replication solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product does block-level replication very well."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is stability."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The most valuable feature we have found in RecoverPoint is its ability to provide the lowest RPO."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive."
"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."
"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."
"The technology enables us to have a safe backup."
"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."
"The technical support is quite good."
"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."
"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"The support is horrible."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"It's necessary to install NetApp simulator to avoid complications."
"We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them."
"The price could be cheaper."
"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"The price needs to be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 17 reviews while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 23 reviews. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Ensuring data resilience and business continuity in disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "Protects our data during any emergency or disaster". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync and NetApp Snapshot, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with NetApp Snapshot, Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell AppSync. See our Dell RecoverPoint vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.