We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Replication solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"When it works, it is the best product that is available."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The tool's most valuable feature is stability."
"It is amazing because it is very easy to test with many alternative bookmarks."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"The most valuable feature we have found in RecoverPoint is its ability to provide the lowest RPO."
"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."
"The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up."
"The technology enables us to have a safe backup."
"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."
"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."
"The solution is very stable."
"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."
"The technical support is quite good."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"The support is horrible."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"When it comes to storage and backup, that is where scalability problems have affected us."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"Compression and deduplication could be improved."
"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."
"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."
"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."
"In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution."
"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."
"The price needs to be improved."
"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 17 reviews while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 23 reviews. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Ensuring data resilience and business continuity in disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "Protects our data during any emergency or disaster". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync and NetApp Snapshot, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with NetApp Snapshot, Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell AppSync. See our Dell RecoverPoint vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.