We performed a comparison between Microsoft Remote Desktop Services and Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Citrix and others in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)."The most valuable feature is performance."
"Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is scalable."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is its security and simple configuration."
"The technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature is ease of use."
"In terms of the valuable features, I like the profile, the new version is really good."
"The most valuable features are the desktop session and desktop virtualization."
"The improvement to our organization is managing all our KVM-based virtual machines in a management environment."
"The most valuable features are automated deployment and transparent movement for virtual machines over all our locations."
"The performance depends on connectivity."
"Security in the connection between us and our clients' servers is something that can be improved."
"Remote Desktop Services doesn't scale well."
"My customers are worried that the RDP protocol can be easily compromised and would like the option to use an alternative like Blast."
"The biggest reason we don't use the solution for our company's clients is the solution's prices."
"The solution should have better security."
"Microsoft Remote Desktop Services needs to improve its security."
"It could be made simpler from a management perspective."
"The best improvement for oVirt 4.2 is to enable backup features for major backup products of virtual machines."
More Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is ranked 1st in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) with 69 reviews while Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops is ranked 19th in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI). Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Remote Desktop Services writes "Easy to set up and reliable, but needs an additional control panel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops writes "Manages all our KVM-based virtual machines in a management environment". Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is most compared with TeamViewer, VMware Horizon, VMware Workstation, Citrix Workspace and Parallels Access, whereas Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktops is most compared with Oracle VDI, VMware Horizon View and OpenText Exceed TurboX.
See our list of best Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.