IBM SAN32B-E4 vs IBM SAN384B comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
22 views|19 comparisons
IBM Logo
232 views|190 comparisons
Ranking
11th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
22
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
232
Comparisons
190
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN32B-E4
SAN384B
Learn More
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN32B-E4 is designed to deliver fabric-based encryption services, providing up to 96 Gbps of encryption processing for disk and 48 Gbps of compression and encryption processing for tape.
The IBM System Storage SAN384B fabric backbone is a core and edge network switching platform designed for midrange to enterprise-level Storage Area Network (SAN) applications. It features multiprotocol architecture, high performance, and scalable design:
  • 8 Gbps industry-standard Fibre Channel (FC) switch capability for systems that support 8 Gbps throughput
  • Auto sensing FC ports supporting 1 Gbps, 2 Gbps, 4 Gbps, and 8 Gbps
  • Up to 384, 8 Gbps user ports connected in a dual core with the use of Inter-Chassis Links (ICLs), and up to 192 ports in a single domain
  • High-performance port and switching blades
Sample Customers
Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A., L'Or_al S.A., Vaasan Oy, IBM Systems and Technology Group, Odin
Tabicel, Sanmarco Informatica, National Institutes of Health, Chapman University, Baldor Electric, University of New Brunswick, Harim Group Corp.

IBM SAN32B-E4 is ranked 11th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN384B is ranked 5th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN32B-E4 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN384B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN32B-E4 is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN384B is most compared with IBM SAN48B-5 and Cisco MDS Series.

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.