SAS Enterprise GRC vs Thomson Reuters Accelus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAS Logo
482 views|371 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Thomson Reuters Logo
351 views|181 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAS Enterprise GRC and Thomson Reuters Accelus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
18th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
482
Comparisons
371
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
351
Comparisons
181
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Accelus
Learn More
Thomson Reuters
Video Not Available
Overview
With SAS Enterprise GRC, you can standardize and manage strategic and operational risks, and consolidate information from all financial risk management systems (credit risk, market risk, etc.) into an enterprisewide view of risk.

Our solutions dynamically connect business transactions, strategy, and operations to the ever-changing regulatory environment, providing highly regulated firms with informed outcomes. Our client groups include compliance, audit, legal and risk functions within the organization. We partner with firms to manage their risk exposure and accelerate their business at every step. In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations need to be empowered with tools

that help them navigate the constantly shifting rules, internal business processes, and regulatory

reporting requirements. Thomson Reuters Accelus™ Compliance Management Solutions provide regulatory insight through the ability to identify, map and track regulatory change, process integrity with workflow designed to communicate, test, and audit controls including policies and training, and transparency with capabilities to evidence risk and controls to management and regulators.

Sample Customers
Belgium Special Tax, New Zealand Ministry of Health, New Zealand Ministry of Social Development North Carolina Marine Fisheries, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Town of Cary Western Australia Police
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company12%
Insurance Company12%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Computer Software Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SAS Enterprise GRC is ranked 18th in GRC while Thomson Reuters Accelus is ranked 24th in GRC. SAS Enterprise GRC is rated 10.0, while Thomson Reuters Accelus is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SAS Enterprise GRC writes "We've improved our data management & human resource skills. Needs to work more on its presentation layer for users". On the other hand, SAS Enterprise GRC is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and IBM OpenPages, whereas Thomson Reuters Accelus is most compared with FIS Protegent and RSA Archer.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.