We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The search functionality is a really powerful feature."
"It is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are the ease of creating documentation, as well as charts."
"What I like the most is the Wiki software that comes with Atlassian Confluence."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"As for valuable features, the team management features help us to share information very easily."
"For me, the most valuable feature is its high performance. It's crucial for us in the bank, as we handle a massive number of transactions every day."
"The solution offers a lot of freedom when drafting directly online."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"I do like the collaboration around documents. The versioning history has proven useful in some instances as well."
"It has made us faster and more efficient."
"It has improve our organization by speeding up document sharing."
"The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit."
"Quantity and variety of partners with solution development ability on the platform."
"The roadmap feature should be made easier to work with and modify. It's not really scalable."
"They can improve the table feature of Confluence. It is currently not adequate."
"There are some issues with performance when creating tables."
"I would like to see integration with Slack."
"The scalability for larger companies could be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"Space maintenance could be made a little more user-friendly."
"The price could be improved. I have heard that certain adjustments would be made in 2024 and that it will then be more expensive, but I don't know the specifics."
"There's a challenge with desktop applications synchronizing with online documents in real-time. If someone is working on a document in the desktop version of Excel, for example, and someone else is editing the same document online, the changes won't sync immediately. That's the only real challenge we've encountered."
"Too many versions being released in a short time period. Too much time being devoted to migration planning."
"Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents."
"It should have more user-friendly customization, as it still requires developers to get engaged and build sites."
"The integration with Outlook could be improved."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 98 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.