We performed a comparison between Drupal and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"It is good for big projects."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"It offers an easy way to store unstructured content (.pdf, .doc, .xls, images) and to tag them with metadata."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."
"It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place."
"The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"Improve the user-friendliness."
"It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."
"There are some limitations on storage."
"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."
Earn 20 points
Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 146 reviews. Drupal is rated 8.6, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Drupal is most compared with WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Atlassian Confluence, Magnolia CMS and Sitecore Experience Manager, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.