We performed a comparison between SolarWinds Virtualization Manager and Veeam ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtualization Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of SolarWinds Virtualization Manager are the non-Windows servers' monitoring and capacity planning."
"SolarWinds Virtualization Manager is a great tool that is easy to use...It is a stable solution."
"It has been useful for monitoring, troubleshooting, and assessing our environment, as well as for investigating bottlenecks."
"Veeam One is a centralized management and centralized reporting tool. The tool has supportive infrastructure to create specialised applications and some server application. You can add all the resources and infrastructure. You will get the reports, can easily manage and monitor any feature."
"Storage gateway feature is very flexible."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward for me."
"I like the backup and backup copy features."
"First, I like that this solution is fast. Second, I like the stability and flexibility."
"The stability of Veeam ONE is good."
"The feature that we have found most valuable is its traffic plan. The traffic plan is very good."
"The problem or issue with the product is related to its pricing."
"The SolarWinds Virtualization Manager platform in general can have a better response time in the performance."
"It would be better if the solution presented the number of servers and the success rate on the dashboard."
"The reports are basic and not customizable, making it challenging to get detailed insights."
"The solution could improve the performance. We are not able to check the status of any system. Additionally, if there was an option to monitor server clusters it would be helpful."
"Sometimes, it's a little difficult for me to use its user interface. Its scope is very big with a lot of tuning, settings, and so on. If it's difficult for me, it must also be difficult for our customers."
"They need to support more platforms."
"One common customer complaint is that Veeam, not just Veeam ONE, has become increasingly complex over time. This means that it is now very feature-rich, which can be challenging for some users to navigate and understand. There is a need for more education on how to use the GUI and all of the available features. Even regular users of Veeam may struggle to utilize the new features, which makes it more challenging for backup administrators to manage their backups. The platform is not becoming simpler, but rather, it is becoming more complicated over time."
"It's not that easy to use from the management side."
"If you don't have technical knowledge about these services, monitoring the virtual machines is hard."
More SolarWinds Virtualization Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager is ranked 8th in Virtualization Management Tools with 6 reviews while Veeam ONE is ranked 5th in Virtualization Management Tools with 57 reviews. SolarWinds Virtualization Manager is rated 7.4, while Veeam ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SolarWinds Virtualization Manager writes "A tool with an easy initial setup phase and high scalability that needs to improve its pricing and include reporting features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam ONE writes "A tool useful to monitor infrastructures and for backup purposes that needs to improve its deployment process". SolarWinds Virtualization Manager is most compared with VMware Aria Operations, IBM Turbonomic and VMware vSphere, whereas Veeam ONE is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware Aria Operations, VMware vSphere, Zabbix and Nutanix Prism. See our SolarWinds Virtualization Manager vs. Veeam ONE report.
See our list of best Virtualization Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.