We performed a comparison between Spiceworks and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very stable. It's reliable and efficient."
"It's easy to understand."
"It lets us know whether devices are getting out of date and tracked warranties. Spiceworks also gave me visibility in terms of what software was installed on each device and its status."
"Spiceworks is generic and free."
"The solution can find all asset details automatically, whether it's a Mac address, computer name, IP address, models, etc. It's very helpful."
"Helpdesk and inventory are both equally valuable, and they form the true core of the product."
"It was easy to integrate Spiceworks with our existing setup."
"Tickets by e-mail, with actions by hastag."
"Zabbix is good for discovery."
"Zabbix is both stable and scalable."
"SNMP monitoring, source discovery, and alert triggering are most valuable."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"Zabbix has a roadmap and they are continuously and frequently adding new features."
"The product is very stable."
"Zabbix helps to save time."
"The network mapping could be improved. Putting together an actual bonafide network map would be really nice."
"Sometimes, it can be difficult to integrate what you need."
"Since Spiceworks is a free tool, it's not very scriptable or customizable."
"Having an integrated asset management tool, where I can plug in things that are offline, would be good."
"Once a device was recognized on the network, Spiceworks never got rid of it even after you took it off the network. You had to go in and manually remove it."
"One of the biggest ways in which Spiceworks could improve is by developing better and more automated workflows. For example, in another solution called ServiceDesk by ManageEngine, you can have levels of approval in the event that there is a request for new software, or when someone requests a VPN or WiFi connection. This kind of multi-stage approval feature provided by ServiceDesk does not appear to exist in Spiceworks, and it is one of their main shortcomings for me."
"They've also tried to integrate it with social logins, like Twitter and LinkedIn, and that type of login authentication has no place in a corporate application."
"With Spiceworks, like, when I open the websites, I have to Zoom in. I need to zoom in on those websites sometimes because it makes it horrible to use."
"There is a bit of a learning curve during installation."
"They should open an SSH session from the web interface."
"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."
"Documentation terminology could be improved."
"The solution needs to add features for finding loopholes or problems and their root causes."
"Look and feel."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"Zabbix can use better documentation and support for troubleshooting."
Spiceworks is ranked 46th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 47 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 96 reviews. Spiceworks is rated 7.8, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Spiceworks writes "Good low-cost service desk system, but lacks in automation workflows and categorization ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Spiceworks is most compared with Lansweeper, ServiceNow, Freshdesk, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Nagios Core, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core. See our Spiceworks vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.