We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"It is not a pricey product compared to other data warehouse solutions."
"We can store the data in a data lake for a very low cost."
"Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time."
"We have complete control over our data."
"Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution."
"I like Data Warehouse's data integrity features. Data integrity is what databases are made for as opposed to spreadsheets."
"The data transmissions between the data models is the most valuable feature."
"The solution has been reliable."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"It could be made more user-friendly for business users which would increase the user base."
"The query is slow if we don't optimize it."
"If the database is large with a lot of columns then it is difficult to clean the data."
"It could offer more development across the solution."
"I would like the tool to support different operating systems."
"We find the cost of the solution to be a little high."
"The reporting for certain types of data needs to be improved."
"I think that the error messages need to be made more specific."
More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 27th in Data Warehouse while Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 12 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "User-friendly UI and good support". Infobright DB is most compared with MySQL and LocalDB, whereas Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA, Snowflake and VMware Tanzu Greenplum.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
You are asking about front end tools but you do not mention which ones. What you have are "database backends" and each has different features. The utilization will depend on what kind of expertise you have available else you will end up trying to implement say, Teradata on Exadata which may not give you the best solution. What are your criteria for success? Based on these you will have to evaluate each solution -- I am sure each vendor will be happy to set up the environment and work with your set of sampl,e data to show you have they evaluate against your criteria.
Given we partner with many or all of the above, or can get to them as we access all data, I have the following opinion - InfoBright is very new and probable to be sold long term. It is also an expensive subscription so presents highest risk to me. Exidata is Oracle - if you like Oracle and their style, it maybe ok, but then it is Oracle. Microsoft is Microsoft - tends to be cheap to acquire and expensive to implement and maintain. Teradata is pricey but of the group presents the least risk and the greatest number of front end partners. The product I represent is unique as it is designed for high complexity large numbers of users and data and runs inside Teradata taking better advantage of the architecture.
Disclosure: I work for Information Builders