We performed a comparison between SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides very good integration."
"The actual interface is good."
"They provide easy integration with other systems."
"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."
"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."
"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."
"The most valuable features are the large volume of data and the structuring of the data to optimize it and get very optimal data warehouse solutions for customers."
"It is a solid database a lot of different tools to move data."
"I like this solution's ease of design and the fact that its performance is quite good. It is stable as well."
"It is a stable program."
"It's the same as your visual database. I like the fast load feature for data, the BTQ solution is very good, and storage procedures are very fast."
"I found all parts --loading, transformation, processing & querying work in parallel, and end-to-end-- to be valuable."
"Parallel processing features have helped to easily dump any size of data and retrieve data with great performance."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."
"User interface could be more user friendly."
"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."
"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."
"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."
"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."
"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."
"Teradata can improve the way it handles big data and unstructured data."
"Apart from Control-M, it would be nice if it could integrate with other tools."
"Data ingestion is done via external utilities and not by the query language itself. It would be more convenient to have that functionality within its SQL dialect."
"It would help to make scaling easier with a reduced cost. "
"Needs compatibility with more Big Data platforms."
"The current operational approach needs improvement."
"It could use some more advanced analytics relating to structured and semi-structured data."
"Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency."
More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 17th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes " Loaded with a lot of features but the price is a drawback ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, SAP SQL Anywhere, Oracle Database and IBM Db2 Database, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery. See our SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.