We performed a comparison between SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."
"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."
"The actual interface is good."
"Provides very good integration."
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."
"They provide easy integration with other systems."
"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."
"Improved performance of ETL procedures, reporting."
"We really enjoy the FastLoad, TPump, and MultiLoad features."
"Teradata features high productivity and reliability because it has several redundancy options, so the system is always up and running."
"Viewpoint, the detailed query logs and performance statistics are valuable features."
"The flexibility in design is very good."
"Building a data warehouse with Teradata has definitely helped a lot of our downstream applications to more easily access information."
"The two types of partitioning have been very significant for us - row and columnar partitioning."
"It's a pre-configured appliance that requires very little in terms of setting-up."
"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."
"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."
"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."
"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."
"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."
"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."
"User interface could be more user friendly."
"It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI."
"The capability to implement it with comparable performance across various private cloud environments, ensuring adaptability to different infrastructure setups would be beneficial."
"Teradata can improve the way it handles big data and unstructured data."
"I think the UI is not there yet. It could be improved by being more user-friendly."
"The solution is stable. However, there are times when we are using large amounts of data and we can see some latency issues."
"Teradata's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The setup is not straightforward."
"Teradata needs to expand the kind of training that's available to customers. Teradata only offers training directly and doesn't delegate to any third-party companies. As a result, it's harder to find people trained on Teradata in our market relative to Oracle."
More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 17th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes " Loaded with a lot of features but the price is a drawback ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, SAP SQL Anywhere, Oracle Database and IBM Db2 Database, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery. See our SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.