We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."
"Basically, the capacity to construct various products is something I find handy."
"TFS’s test management capability without the expensive licensing has large gaps. Users will be unable to access performance testing and coded UI testing capabilities."
"The most valuable features are the dashboard and task-selection capability."
"It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is integration, particularly if you have a .NET application."
"The API for managing TFS programmatically is very powerful, you can listen on work items changes by TFS events."
"TFS is very user-friendly."
"It's user friendly. We haven't had any issues so far. It's flexible. If we need something, we can always contact the owner in our headquarters to make a configuration."
"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."
"TFS needs to be stable."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"I only use 1% of the functionality, so I am not familiar enough to know what needs to be improved."
"The usability of TFS is not that great."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
"The project management side should be addressed and the project and release planning should be somewhat extended."
"The solution's server for deployment needs to be improved."
Earn 20 points
Agile Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Agile Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Agile Manager [EOL] writes "We have the ability to define common standard procedures and methodologies. I'm looking for better integration using Octane". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Agile Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.