We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."
"It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile."
"For what I need TFS for, I have never run into any limitation."
"Good branching and labelling features."
"Team Foundation Server (TFS) is easy to use, and we have a complete trail and traceability. We also like the access control part."
"It is easy to push our changes from quality to pre-prod and prod."
"Work item management integration with source control."
"The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."
"The interface can be improved and made more user-friendly."
"There's not automatic access to test case management and execution."
"In the next release, I would like them to include integration for various projects, similar to what JIRA has, and they could create this feature on the dashboard."
"Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization."
"As an end-user, I expect the solution's performance to be faster while staying as stable as possible."
"More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively."
"The solution's server for deployment needs to be improved."
"I understand Microsoft is phasing out TFS in favor of Git, so I would steer anyone interested in TFS to look into Git."
Earn 20 points
Agile Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. Agile Manager [EOL] is rated 7.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Agile Manager [EOL] writes "We have the ability to define common standard procedures and methodologies. I'm looking for better integration using Octane". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Agile Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.