We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This framework is very easy to use and tweak for our business needs."
"The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"We find the solution to be scalable."
"ASP.NET's best features are its application structure and API testing."
"The main pro is that it's very easy and we have Microsoft helping to stabilize the product which is coming with the all new features every year."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, scalability, and flexibility."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is the support of multiple platforms with ASP.NET Core. Additionally, Azure integrates well with ASP.NET and Visual Studio."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"I was testing how to publish in a cloud using Azure and it was very easy."
"It is great for integration with Excel."
"Code management is a new and convenient feature."
"I like the IDE or the integrated development environment. It's the best IDE."
"Microsoft Visual Studio helps my company improve efficiency in software development suites."
"Microsoft Visual Studio is a must-have tool if you work in Windows environments."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is how easy it is to access all the basic templates for development. There are so many features you get with Visual Studio that it's really helpful for the deployment, the development, and the intelligence behind it."
"Performance is an area that can always be improved."
"You are required to have knowledge of C#."
"I'd like to be able to run any application from a specific point instead of compiling all the code. For example, if I want to test function A, I should be able to test it even if my other functions aren't working. Like in SQL, you provide parameters to the function, and it executes. I'd like to see something similar in ASP.NET."
"In my opinion, this solution should improve their web toolkit."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"The solution is out of date and should not be used."
"In the future, I would like to see more AI and machine learning technologies made available in libraries."
"An area for improvement is the structure template."
"There could be more coding languages in the solution."
"Sometimes, the deprecation of packages can be a challenge."
"The technical support can be slow."
"The solution must provide user-friendly features."
"Long installation or upgrade times are sometimes a problem."
"Microsoft Visual Studio could benefit from a more centralized education system."
"There could be some features for YAML pipelines in Visual Studio."
"The hot reload feature is good, but sometimes it doesn't work. It could be improved."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
