We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"It is seamless compared to Java or any other technology stack."
"This framework is very easy to use and tweak for our business needs."
"The developer support for ASP.NET is a big positive. It's actually very good, and since there are so many people who use ASP.NET, it's easy to get responses to questions about ASP.NET in the broader community."
"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."
"We find the solution to be scalable."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, scalability, and flexibility."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"I like the product's connection with Azure analytics services and the ability to build the model on the cloud."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is the user interface."
"We can write programming code, write our test cases and automate tests in Visual Studio.NET."
"The code analysis tool is particularly valuable as it eliminates the need for manual code reviews."
"Microsoft Visual Studio helps my company improve efficiency in software development suites."
"It's pretty prevalent."
"Visual Studio is a tool used for custom software development. It covers everything under this umbrella, including architecture for automation testing."
"It is a straightforward solution to set up."
"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."
"There should be consistent customization related to security, features, and developers, making the solution more understandable and adaptable."
"You are required to have knowledge of C#."
"The solution needs to support its framework on all devices used for mobile application development."
"ASP.NET is not the best solution for all companies looking to implement a solution like it."
"ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster."
"An area for improvement is the structure template."
"In addition to the visual aspect, there is a need for ASP.NET to provide a robust visual front end like there was in the past."
"You do need to do some training in order to really take advantage of the solution."
"Its setup process could be more straightforward."
"In the next version I would like to see a better development tool."
"The UI could be better, and development could be easier on Microsoft Visual Studio if there were more features like drag and drop and more frameworks, etc."
"Microsoft should add more visualization for analytical studies or research."
"I would like to see Visual Studio improve reporting to give us more details on failures. When there are failures, it's difficult to debug. It would be helpful to have more error information to help us to identify the issue and resolve it. I want to know more about software failures and exceptions in the system."
"There's not much help to deal with issues on Microsoft's official websites."
"Microsoft Visual Studio needs to improve integration."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.