We compared SugarCRM Platform and Zoho CRM across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: SugarCRM Platform is recognized for its customizable features, Jira integration, and export functionalities. Zoho CRM receives acclaim for its intuitive interface, customizable choices, cost-effectiveness, and extensive features.
Room for Improvement: SugarCRM Platform requires enhancements in personalization options, user interface, and customization capabilities. Zoho CRM users said the mobile app could be simpler and that Zoho could improve its data organization and automation.
Service and Support: SugarCRM Platform users are content with the assistance they have received and have not required technical support. Zoho CRM generally offers good customer service, with responsive support during regular business hours. However, some users had mixed experiences with knowledge and availability.
Ease of Deployment: SugarCRM Platform's setup is straightforward and can typically be completed in under two weeks. Zoho CRM's setup process differs in terms of complexity and time required. While some users found it straightforward, others mentioned that it took a significant amount of time, ranging from weeks to months.
Pricing: SugarCRM Platform provides more flexible pricing options with a fixed setup cost and monthly user charges. Zoho CRM is praised for its affordable pricing, being seen as competitive and reasonable. Customers appreciate the cost-effectiveness of using Zoho CRM in the cloud, which eliminates the need for hardware investment.
ROI: Reviews offered little information about the ROI of SugarCRM Platform. Zoho CRM enhances productivity and effectiveness, minimizing the requirement for extra personnel and leading to a positive return on investment.
Comparison Results: SugarCRM Platform is an affordable solution with a simple setup process and lots of customization options. However, it lacks user-friendly interfaces, and configuring user permissions can be complicated. Some users also reported bugs and glitches. Zoho CRM is commended for its simplicity and intuitive interface. It is more cost-effective and offers more features than many competing solutions. However, users have said Zoho’s scalability and customization options are limited.
"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."
"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."
"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."
"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."
"The most valuable solution of Zoho CRM is lead management and analytics. It has a powerful analytics tool."
"Zoho CRM has a location-based feature where if I'm visiting certain customers in a day, it can indicate to me the most efficient route. However, this is if the location of all the offices or places is updated, it saves my time. The calendar in Zoho CRM is synchronized with Google Calander which is very useful for me."
"Zoho CRM integrates easily with customer service workflows."
"Zoho CRM has been a really good product. From a basic CRM perspective, we use it to maintain the details of our company's customers."
"Highly configurable, enabling graphically built workflows, and the writing of customized scripts if required."
"Its initial setup process for the cloud-based version is straightforward."
"Zoho CRM's best feature is its reporting."
"The solution has an efficient notification feature."
"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."
"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."
"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."
"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."
"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."
"This solution needs a more user-friendly interface."
"The MCR capabilities have some limitations."
"Custom development is often necessary to make such extensive changes, and it does come with associated costs."
"The solution can improve by having a policy that allows us to integrate with the cloud."
"What needs improvement in Zoho CRM is the UI. It needs to be more user-friendly. I like Salesforce better than Zoho CRM in terms of the UI, so if Zoho CRM can make some UI changes, that would make the tool better."
"I'd like the solution to offer more integrations with other products."
"Some of our clients could not develop their requirements using the product."
"Sometimes, there are technical glitches. When we add product details, the information disappears. It can be improved from this aspect. Some of the bugs also need to be resolved."
SugarCRM Platform is ranked 29th in CRM with 11 reviews while Zoho CRM is ranked 6th in CRM with 46 reviews. SugarCRM Platform is rated 7.0, while Zoho CRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SugarCRM Platform writes "User-friendly and allows for creating your own modules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho CRM writes "A highly stable solution that allows customization and data sharing". SugarCRM Platform is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, whereas Zoho CRM is most compared with SAP CRM, monday.com, Bitrix24, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and LeadSquared. See our SugarCRM Platform vs. Zoho CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Sales Force Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.