We compared SugarCRM Platform and Zoho CRM across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: SugarCRM Platform is recognized for its customizable features, Jira integration, and export functionalities. Zoho CRM receives acclaim for its intuitive interface, customizable choices, cost-effectiveness, and extensive features.
Room for Improvement: SugarCRM Platform requires enhancements in personalization options, user interface, and customization capabilities. Zoho CRM users said the mobile app could be simpler and that Zoho could improve its data organization and automation.
Service and Support: SugarCRM Platform users are content with the assistance they have received and have not required technical support. Zoho CRM generally offers good customer service, with responsive support during regular business hours. However, some users had mixed experiences with knowledge and availability.
Ease of Deployment: SugarCRM Platform's setup is straightforward and can typically be completed in under two weeks. Zoho CRM's setup process differs in terms of complexity and time required. While some users found it straightforward, others mentioned that it took a significant amount of time, ranging from weeks to months.
Pricing: SugarCRM Platform provides more flexible pricing options with a fixed setup cost and monthly user charges. Zoho CRM is praised for its affordable pricing, being seen as competitive and reasonable. Customers appreciate the cost-effectiveness of using Zoho CRM in the cloud, which eliminates the need for hardware investment.
ROI: Reviews offered little information about the ROI of SugarCRM Platform. Zoho CRM enhances productivity and effectiveness, minimizing the requirement for extra personnel and leading to a positive return on investment.
Comparison Results: SugarCRM Platform is an affordable solution with a simple setup process and lots of customization options. However, it lacks user-friendly interfaces, and configuring user permissions can be complicated. Some users also reported bugs and glitches. Zoho CRM is commended for its simplicity and intuitive interface. It is more cost-effective and offers more features than many competing solutions. However, users have said Zoho’s scalability and customization options are limited.
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."
"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."
"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."
"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."
"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."
"Zoho CRM has been a really good product. From a basic CRM perspective, we use it to maintain the details of our company's customers."
"The user interface, especially the dashboard, offers good navigation."
"The solution is always stable."
"Zoho CRM is very simple and easy to use."
"CRM software that's simple to use, with good technical support, scalability, and stability."
"There's no installation required."
"There are many features that capture customer data."
"It is customizable. We have customized the CRM according to our needs."
"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."
"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."
"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."
"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."
"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."
"There was a challenge while deploying Zoho when we brought an API code. Because integrations "aren't perfect" for every organization."
"Zoho CRM’s customer service can be a little difficult to reach sometimes."
"I would like to see better integration with Zoho Creator."
"Sometimes, there are technical glitches. When we add product details, the information disappears. It can be improved from this aspect. Some of the bugs also need to be resolved."
"In Creator, you can do calculations and change another field immediately after you enter any value. If you add the quantity or price in any field, you can immediately change the total in Creator. The same functionality is not directly available in CRM because it is prebuilt."
"The only thing I noticed was that it does not support multi-country operations. In Canada, for example, we do not use the term "state," but rather "province," and we do not use zip codes, but rather "postal codes.""
"It is hard to modify information around a customer. You need to pay for the features and the tool needs to improve it."
"We would like to always email users as soon as any new features are launched."
SugarCRM Platform is ranked 29th in CRM with 11 reviews while Zoho CRM is ranked 6th in CRM with 47 reviews. SugarCRM Platform is rated 7.0, while Zoho CRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SugarCRM Platform writes "User-friendly and allows for creating your own modules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho CRM writes "A highly stable solution that allows customization and data sharing". SugarCRM Platform is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, whereas Zoho CRM is most compared with SAP CRM, monday.com, Bitrix24, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and LeadSquared. See our SugarCRM Platform vs. Zoho CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Sales Force Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.