We compared SugarCRM Platform and Zoho CRM across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: SugarCRM Platform is recognized for its customizable features, Jira integration, and export functionalities. Zoho CRM receives acclaim for its intuitive interface, customizable choices, cost-effectiveness, and extensive features.
Room for Improvement: SugarCRM Platform requires enhancements in personalization options, user interface, and customization capabilities. Zoho CRM users said the mobile app could be simpler and that Zoho could improve its data organization and automation.
Service and Support: SugarCRM Platform users are content with the assistance they have received and have not required technical support. Zoho CRM generally offers good customer service, with responsive support during regular business hours. However, some users had mixed experiences with knowledge and availability.
Ease of Deployment: SugarCRM Platform's setup is straightforward and can typically be completed in under two weeks. Zoho CRM's setup process differs in terms of complexity and time required. While some users found it straightforward, others mentioned that it took a significant amount of time, ranging from weeks to months.
Pricing: SugarCRM Platform provides more flexible pricing options with a fixed setup cost and monthly user charges. Zoho CRM is praised for its affordable pricing, being seen as competitive and reasonable. Customers appreciate the cost-effectiveness of using Zoho CRM in the cloud, which eliminates the need for hardware investment.
ROI: Reviews offered little information about the ROI of SugarCRM Platform. Zoho CRM enhances productivity and effectiveness, minimizing the requirement for extra personnel and leading to a positive return on investment.
Comparison Results: SugarCRM Platform is an affordable solution with a simple setup process and lots of customization options. However, it lacks user-friendly interfaces, and configuring user permissions can be complicated. Some users also reported bugs and glitches. Zoho CRM is commended for its simplicity and intuitive interface. It is more cost-effective and offers more features than many competing solutions. However, users have said Zoho’s scalability and customization options are limited.
"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."
"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."
"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."
"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."
"We use the solution for different projects. We use it to patch lead details from clients' sources."
"I am impressed with the product's information on customers."
"One of the most important features is that it's a cloud base and, it's also quite cheaper when compared to other solutions. Zoho CRM is customizable as per your requirement and, the Zoho team is able to help you to customize the CRM based on your requirements, and you can integrate to any third-party solution."
"The best thing about Zoho CRM is that it is integrated with other Zoho applications."
"I think the whole pipeline tracking is most useful for us."
"Zoho CRM integrates easily with customer service workflows."
"Zoho CRM has been a really good product. From a basic CRM perspective, we use it to maintain the details of our company's customers."
"Highly configurable, enabling graphically built workflows, and the writing of customized scripts if required."
"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."
"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."
"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."
"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."
"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."
"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."
"We would like to always email users as soon as any new features are launched."
"I'd like the solution to offer more integrations with other products."
"The mobile application is a little complicated and could be simplified."
"I'm not sure that there is scalability potential for enterprises."
"The chatbot feature is not very intelligent and lacks AI capabilities."
"Zoho CRM has a rule engine or a place where you can set certain rules. That's not evolved very much. They could improve this within the platform."
"Since Zoho CRM is not made for the enterprise kind of company, its stability for enterprise businesses could be improved."
"The support response time for this solution could be improved."
SugarCRM Platform is ranked 29th in CRM with 11 reviews while Zoho CRM is ranked 6th in CRM with 46 reviews. SugarCRM Platform is rated 7.0, while Zoho CRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SugarCRM Platform writes "User-friendly and allows for creating your own modules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho CRM writes "A highly stable solution that allows customization and data sharing". SugarCRM Platform is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, whereas Zoho CRM is most compared with SAP CRM, monday.com, Bitrix24, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and LeadSquared. See our SugarCRM Platform vs. Zoho CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Sales Force Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.