Hyper-V has been highly stable. I'm impressed with the performance. Granted, this was my first Hyper-V install, so I was a bit worried about it, but with the hardware platform that we have it on, everything's been excellent stability-wise, and I haven't had any issues with that server. It's been up and working for the past six months. I only had to reboot once to do an update. Everything has been working great.

The tool is very stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The solution is highly stable.

Based on my experience with the product, I can say that my company seems to face some delay in the solution when it comes to the area of replication. The server runs normally in our company, but we are unable to figure out why there is a lag or delay in the replication area, because of which we need to cut down on the replication process and initiate it again.

Stability-wise, Hyper-V is definitely more stable than many other products. Compared to any other hypervisor on the market, Hyper-V is a very solid product. 

In my experience, with good hardware resources and a compatible operating system, I can confidently guarantee a 99.95% SLA (Service Level Agreement) uptime for Hyper-V environments without even needing to check the specific environment beforehand.

The product is stable. Microsoft solutions have been quite stable once you manage your parts properly.

Only ten percent of the time, there are issues related to breakdowns or bugs in the product.

It is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

It works well. It is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

I don't have many insights on stability. I have read a few things, however, it's not really my space. 

It's very stable.

It is a stable product.

It's about 90% stable.

It offers good stability capabilities.

The product is stable.

It is very stable. There are some minor problems, as there is with all software applications, but they are not problems that affect the platform in such a way that your customers are affected. If managed properly according to standards and Microsoft's recommendations, it works. It stays online and is very reliable.

It's very stable. I have never had a problem with Hyper-V's stability.

I find that this solution is very stable.

The product worked well for hosting a few Microsoft solutions.

Hyper-V is a stable product.

Hyper-V is quite stable. I do not have any issues.

At the end of the day, Hyper-V is a Microsoft product. Thus, it provides better stability and is convenient to use.

We've had many issues with Hyper-V's stability, including resource crunches and memory leakage.

We'd like to see the performance improve a bit. 

In our experience, for the most part, the solution is reliable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches. 

I would say that Hyper-V is pretty stable. But when it updates, we must restart all Windows systems. So if Microsoft can fix this thing so that the packages install restarting, then everything would be heaven for us. This means some downtime on our business side.

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. However, the performance could be better.

It is very stable and very reliable. I never had any failures of any description with it, which is amazing. We might have had hardware failures on the host, but everything is redundant, so there is plenty of resilience there.

The stability of the solution is satisfactory. 

The solution is very stable. It doesn't crash. There aren't bugs and glitches that affect its functionality. It's a reliable product.

Hyper-V is not stable - we've had many errors and have had to do a lot of patch fixes for it.

While every product comes with issues, the solution works for us. 

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

The solution is very stable.

The solution needs to improve the stability.

Hyper-V is a stable solution, but not as stable as VMware.

VMware is more stable than Hyper-V.

I have never had any stability problems caused by Hyper-V for over five years.

We do experience some instability with the platform. It usually happens if there is a lot of I/O happening on the volumes that hold the VMs. We also have some issues working with clustered servers not load balancing correctly.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The solution is basically stable. There are not many faults happening in the four or so years that we had it running. Whatever happened was basically either due to the active directory or due to environments like the server itself that had power loss one time. It shut down and we needed to restart it. However, basically, that's an environment issue, not an issue inherent to Hyper-V itself. Otherwise, Hyper-V runs smoothly.

There is a small overhead of resources reserved for the server itself. Other virtualization solutions have less overhead than that. However, due to the fact that Hyper-V is running on Windows Server, there is a margin of overhead reserved for the server itself. 

For the most part, however, it's reliable. 

No issues encountered.

The product is very stable, in particular with the most recent version of Windows Server. This is true even in a cluster environment, and I have never found an issue with stability.

Obviously, when you are using Windows Server update, it will restart the server occasionally and you will have downtime, but it will be minimal. If you don't want to have any downtime then you will need multiple hosts in a cluster environment. You can move your virtual machines from one host to another, which means that you can restart the server and not affect the service. This can be important because sometimes, the restart process takes too much time to complete.

The solution is stable.

I rate the stability of Hyper-V a ten out of ten.

Hyper-V is stable.

Hyper-V is a stable product.

In our organization, this solution is used by more than 1,200 people, and that number will increase to more than 1,500 users next month.

The solution is stable.

The performance isn't that great. If can be slow. 

The stability is okay. I'd describe it as between 50 to 60% stable. 

Once it is setup, there is no problem.

With each update, the security of this solution just gets better and better. It is very stable.

We did have problems, and you need to make sure that the LUNs have enough space. If you run out of space, you will need to spend a few hours to bring the VMs up.

Hyper-V is a stable solution.

It is a pretty stable solution. 

We have found this solution to be quite stable in our experience.

I have not had problems with the stability of the solution. 

The solution is stable in my experience.

This solution is stable.

It is stable, especially if you do Hyper-V clustering. Some customers don't invest much into IT infrastructure, so I design Hyper-V-cluster-based solutions. The only potential problems are attacks on Windows servers, vulnerability issues, or receiving stolen packages could require you to restart it. But it does its job. 

It could be more stable. We faced a lot of issues on the backup site.

Hyper-V is both stable and scalable; however, I also use VMware which I find to be more scalable and stable overall.

It works very well. Its performance, stability, and redundancy are all very dependable.

It's very stable and very scalable. We're a very small operation, so we really just require one person for maintenance and deployment.

It is a very stable product.

Hyper-V has been pretty good. I have no complaints about the stability. 

The solution could be more stable as it is vulnerable to viruses, ransomware, and malware.

It is very stable. We have not had issues with it crashing itself.

It is a stable product.

The performance of Hyper-V is good.

It is not stable. There are problems with backup as well.

We have 400 users of this solution, and use three staff members for deployment and maintenance.

Stability-wise, it is okay but not great. I'd say that it works but it's not perfect.

Initially we were using only one NIC for all VMs, physical servers, and for remote purposes as well. After assigning one NIC to each machine, the performance improved and is now excellent and reliable.

There are sometimes issues with the network but the solution is stable. 

The stability is acceptable for us. We do not have problems with it.

It is a stable product.

The stability is generally good, although it depends on the size of your workload.

It is pretty stable.

Not as of yet. But what's being done is completely unsupported by Dropbox. The way that they view it is just "a file is a file." That's it. So, you synchronize files that are the actual backups - and it's just a file. But using them for a backup solution, they don't support anything other than it being a client application for a user; not as a service or anything else.

All the newer versions of Hyper-V are stable.

Based on my experience, it is stable.

It's too early to tell at the moment. We are still new to using Hyper-V.

It is a stable product. 

The product is stable. We have had no problems.

The stability of the product is fine. There is no problem. The only issues we have is with stability of the operating system. 

I recommend this product due to its high stability. 

It is a very stable product.

Yes.

Hyper-V is not as stable as VMware and should be improved.

The stability of the solution is very good.