It's very, very stable. We don't have a problem with the stability of the solution. It's a very stable solution. It is the best solution for monitoring any IT infrastructure for all companies.

Nagios XI is stable. The stability is great.

It is a stable solution. 

The database is stable and I don't have any problems with the solution.

For the most part, the solution is stable. There were some cases with stability, especially, for example, unexpected issues that you are not aware of at first. All of a sudden you notice that just as an example, the graphs are not actually graphing, all of a sudden. That said, it's very, very, very minimal. We don't experience big issues with Nagios. And yet, it is why we introduced the idea of having a geo-redundancy solution, so that we can also, if something happens, immediately switch and then concentrate to work efficiently on the one having issues.

The product is stable.

If you are monitoring network devices, often it's not scaled for large corporations. Definitely, a minus in that area.

Nagios is very stable, We haven't reports on problems with the Nagios servers in never opportunities.

I'm happy with our service.

We have absolutely no problem with the stability of the solution. I have no problem with the system or the setup. I want to do more to master the system and harness its capability, but that is my limitation.

The solution is very stable, although sometimes we have had problems with the database in cases where we had a large number of roles and services. There have been cases of database corruption that had to be repaired.

Nagios XI is stable.

Nagios XI is stable.

I think that stability is quite good. 

It's a stable solution. We have not had any issues.

The stability of this solution is quite good.

If the machine crashes and it goes down, without properly shutting down the virtual machine, then I get an error that requires the database to be repaired.

No.

The NCC does have issues where it locks up or an admin cannot be sure if the system configuration was exact. I end up saving the system configuration from the Nagios XI native MySQL DB storage paradigm to the old Nagios Core flat file paradigm to confirm proper configuration of the Nagios system.

There have been no issues with the stability.

We have had no issues with the stability.

There have been no performance issues.

Nagios is stable, but we are using mod-Gearman for distributing the solution. There is network limitation on this, such that if the network is not stable, the whole solution is also, not stable.

Generally, it is very stable platform. Occasionally, we have to restart the monitoring engine, but it is very easy to do.

There have been no issues with the stability.

There are stability issues if you have a large number of hosts and services.

Nagios XI is a stable solution.

No. Its new releases come from time to time. Also, if you don't have much expertise, you can opt for its support, but it's a paid service.

The only issue faced is that after 20K services Nagios starts acting weird, due to the amount of checking it does and the amount of data stored in the database.

There have been no performance issues.

It was deployed as a stand alone tool and is also integrated with Docker.

No issues encountered.

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. There is room for improvement.

On older versions I had some minor issues. Currently, to be honest, it is as stable as I could hope for a monitoring tool.

We're still experiencing stability issues with regards to collecting performance graphs.

Nagios is stable.

There have been no performance issues.

There have been no performance issues.

There have been no performance issues.

This is a stable solution. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability a nine.

It's stable.

There have been no performance issues.

The product is quite stable, and we've had no issues.

We found certain stability issues that were solved by fine tuning some system parameters with support help.

We have had no stability issues.