Akamai Ion vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway comparison

"Akamai is easy to use and very effective."

"The tool helps manage microservices by providing developers with a platform to conduct tests and assessments on the web application. The custom domain option is one of the most valuable features I've found. This feature is incredibly helpful for the end-users of the web application. With the custom domain feature, you can change the lengthy link to a shorter, more memorable one. For example, instead of using a lengthy default link, you can customize it to something like imail.com, which is much easier to remember and share."

"The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs."

"I rate Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 1000 users who use it daily."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is its ease of use."

"This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date."

"In my experience, Microsoft products have a smooth integration and facilitate easy management and monitoring. Using Azure Application Gateway allows us to efficiently handle the system loads."

"The pricing is quite good."

"Some of the key features of this solution are the low-level maintenance required, floating proxy service, and load balancing."

"The product must provide more flexibility."

"The monitoring on the solution could be better."

"It does not have the flexibility for using public IPs in version 2."

"Scalability can be an issue."

"It could be more stable, and support could be better. It would also be better if they offered more features. For example, it lacks security features. Before we used another English solution, and we realized that some of the rules were not set up correctly and passed through the Application Gateway's English controllers. But the problem, in this case, is if you send ten rules, for example, six rules hit some issues. IP address blocking could be better. The rules, for example, don't work properly. If you have one issue, one rule or another rule will not work. This sounds like total madness to me."

"The product's performance should be better."

"We faced some downtime while validating CNAME."

"The security of the product could be adjusted."

"Implementing and standardizing the solution across the IT landscape in a heterogeneous environment is painful."

"The tool is expensive."

"I rate the pricing seven out of ten because some third-party solutions are even costlier than this."

"The product is not expensive."

"I rate the price of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway an eight out of ten."

"It is not expensive."

"Between v1 and v2, there is a lot of change in the pricing. It is very costly compared to AWS."

"The tool's pricing model is pay-as-you-go."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a pretty affordable product. My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs of the solution. The additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution vary."

"The solution is reasonably priced."