Anomali ThreatStream vs Group-IB Threat Intelligence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Anomali ThreatStream
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
6th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Group-IB Threat Intelligence
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the market share of Anomali ThreatStream is 6.0% and it decreased by 21.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of Group-IB Threat Intelligence is 6.0% and it increased by 107.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PP
Mar 12, 2023
Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved
Our primary use case for this solution is as a threat intelligence platform. We stream various threat feeds into this platform. We also make correlations between the feeds to duplicate the data, aggregate it and then present it to our security solutions for advanced security The way that this…
ALEX LOGINOV - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2024
Completely satisfied with the way the report is prepared and easy to setup
We did use it for threat detection, but not directly. I analyze multiple reports, including this one, and assess my client's infrastructure. I identify threats outlined in the reports that may be relevant to the client's infrastructure, and then I help them build detection use cases. There's no automation. We don't do anything automatically at this point. It's all manual and based on analysis. I can't integrate it into automatic feeds because the report outlines threats that may not be relevant to the client's infrastructure. So, I do the analysis and integrate it manually. I'm completely satisfied with the way the report is prepared. It's a good report.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"The most valuable Group-IB Threat Intelligence features are their detections, especially in terms of account and card information leakage. This data sets Group-IB apart from some of the competition."
"We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable."
"Threat Intelligence's best feature is threat activation."
"The totality of the recordings is quite important. The networks, the new threat actors, the new methods, tactics, techniques, and procedures."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the sandbox."
 

Cons

"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"The lack of appliance-based or on-premise options for this solution is its biggest downfall. Clients request them often."
"Threat Intelligence's OT security could be improved."
"As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework."
"The web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions."
"Group-IB Threat Intelligence should improve integration for SIEM and SOAR solutions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Threat Intelligence is costly, but it gives value for money."
"Group-IB Threat Intelligence's pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing is alright. It's right on the mark."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Anomali ThreatStream?
The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick.
What needs improvement with Anomali ThreatStream?
I think that this solution should improve its integrations. This part of the solution could be bigger and moved into the no-code direction. Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks.
What is your primary use case for Anomali ThreatStream?
Our primary use case for this solution is as a threat intelligence platform. We stream various threat feeds into this platform. We also make correlations between the feeds to duplicate the data, ag...
What do you like most about Group-IB Threat Intelligence?
We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Group-IB Threat Intelligence?
The pricing is alright. It's right on the mark. It costs money, but it's not too high. It's reasonable. For me, it's a reasonable price for the quality of the product.
What needs improvement with Group-IB Threat Intelligence?
As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Even though it is done in the report, it could be done better.
 

Also Known As

ThreatStream OPTIC
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BBCN Bank
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: May 2024.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.