Camunda vs Oracle BPEL comparison

"The solution is useful for small projects."

"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."

"The graphical interface is very beneficial."

"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."

"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

"The product has everything we need."

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."

"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."

"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."

"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"The product is moderately priced."