Checkmarx One vs WAPPLES comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
68
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (11th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
WAPPLES
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (44th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the market share of Checkmarx One is 13.2% and it decreased by 13.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of WAPPLES is 0.0% and it increased by Infinity% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
Unique Categories:
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.2%
Vulnerability Management
1.3%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
0.2%
 

Featured Reviews

MH
May 9, 2023
Responsive support, useful code-checking module, and high availability
Checkmarx is used to check the code from programmers and vulnerabilities in third-party software. Checkmarx can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise. However, it depends on the version Checkmarx detected code sections that did not adhere to best practices. After being informed, the programmers…
Use WAPPLES?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."
"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."
"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
"It is an expensive solution."
"It is the right price for quality delivery."
"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."
"It is a good product but a little overpriced."
"It's relatively expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: June 2024.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.